Veronika Rychlá

The Supreme Court reversed a Colorado Supreme Court decision that sought to bar former President Donald J. Trump from the Republican primary ballot based on Section 3 of the Fourteenth Amendment. The Court held that Congress, not the States, is responsible for enforcing this section against federal officeholders and candidates.

The Supreme Court addressed the standing of plaintiffs challenging a student loan forgiveness plan under the HEROES Act, concluding that the plaintiffs lacked standing due to the inability to trace their alleged injuries directly to the plan. Introduction: This case scrutinizes the procedural and substantive legal challenges against the Department

This case examined the authority of the Secretary of Education under the HEROES Act to enact a student loan forgiveness program, cancelling approximately $430 billion in debt. The Supreme Court determined that the HEROES Act did not authorize the Secretary to implement such a sweeping loan forgiveness program. Introduction: The

The Supreme Court clarified the standards for religious accommodations under Title VII of the Civil Rights Act, holding that an employer must demonstrate that accommodating an employee's religious practices would result in "substantial increased costs" to the business, moving beyond the previous "de minimis cost" standard. Introduction: This case involves

The case centers on the foreign reach of the Lanham Act's provisions against trademark infringement. The Supreme Court held that the Lanham Act's provisions are not extraterritorial, applying only to domestic use in commerce. Introduction: This case delves into international trademark law, specifically the extraterritorial application of the Lanham Act,

Counterman v. Colorado centers on the necessity of proving a defendant's subjective understanding of the threatening nature of their statements in "true threats" cases. The Supreme Court ruled that recklessness is sufficient as a subjective mental state for such cases, enhancing the First Amendment's protection against chilling effects on speech.

Moore v. Harper addresses whether state legislatures have absolute authority under the Elections Clause to set rules for federal elections, free from state law constraints. The Supreme Court ruled that state legislatures are subject to state constitutional limitations when setting such rules. Introduction: This case involves the intricate balance between

The Supreme Court ruled that 8 U.S.C. § 1324(a)(1)(A)(iv), which criminalizes encouraging or inducing illegal immigration, is not unconstitutionally overbroad under the First Amendment, as it specifically targets the solicitation and facilitation of illegal acts rather than broadly restricting protected speech. Introduction: This case addresses

The Supreme Court decided that district courts must stay proceedings during an interlocutory appeal on the question of arbitrability, aligning with the principle that an appeal divests the lower court of control over aspects of the case involved in the appeal. Introduction: This case examines the procedural implications of interlocutory

The Supreme Court held that the Confrontation Clause was not violated by admitting a non-testifying co-defendant's confession that indirectly implicated the defendant, provided it was accompanied by a proper limiting instruction. Introduction: This case explores the boundaries of the Confrontation Clause in the context of joint trials and the admissibility