Audio Law Reader AI study aid app (Page 9)

Audio Law Reader AI study aid app

More issues

Case Digest on Obergefell v. Hodges

Denying same-sex couples the right to marry violates the Equal Protection Clause of the Fourteenth Amendment. This is the doctrine established in the U.S. landmark case of Obergefell v. Hodges in 2015. Check out this two-minute case digest by Audio Law Reader.🎧📚 0:00 /2:05 1× FACTS OF

Case Digest on Loving v. Virginia

Individuals have the fundamental right to marry whomever they choose, regardless of their racial backgrounds. Any restriction based on race are inherently discriminatory and unconstitutional. This is the doctrine established in the U.S. landmark case of Loving v. Virginia in 1967. Check out this two-minute case digest by Audio

Case Digest on Near v. Minnesota

Government actions that seek to prevent the publication of materials before they are distributed are presumptively unconstitutional and are violative of the First Amendment's protection of freedom of the press. This is the doctrine established in the U.S. landmark case of Near v. Minnesota in 1931. Check out this

Case Digest on Mapp v. Ohio

All evidence obtained by illegal searches and seizures is inadmissible in court. This is the doctrine established in the U.S. landmark case of Mapp v. Ohio in 1961. Check out this one-minute case digest by Audio Law Reader.🎧📚 0:00 /1:30 1× FACTS OF THE CASE: In 1957,

Case Digest on Miranda v. Arizona

Any statement obtained in violation of the Miranda rights are deemed inadmissible in court. This is the doctrine established in the U.S. landmark case of Miranda v. Arizona in 1966. Check out this two-minute case digest by Audio Law Reader.🎧📚 0:00 /2:10 1× FACTS OF THE CASE:

Case Digest on Marbury v. Madison

Judges can determine whether or not federal laws are constitutional; and federal laws that are in conflict with the U.S. Constitution are invalid. These are the two important legal doctrines established by the U.S. landmark case on Marbury v. Madison in 1803. Check out this two-minute case digest

Jak se (ne)připravit na advokátní zkoušku

Pokud se po pětiletém magisterském studiu práv nakonec opravdu rozhodnete pro kariéru advokáta, čeká Vás po získání vysněného titulu Mgr. další dlouhý boj za opravdový výkon advokacie. „To dáš, titul už máš, tak to bude přeci brnkačka.“ se lehko řekne, ale užitečná rada to pro advokátního koncipienta není, spíš naopak.

Study skills for law students 2: Understanding before memorising

How school ruined any enjoyment of learning for me I was always an inquisitive child so I was genuinely looking forward to grammar school. I’ve already mentioned in the previous article that grammar school is a type of secondary school that is academically very selective with a very strict

A comparison between WestLaw and Lexis Nexis for a law student

LexisNexis and WestLaw are both amazing online legal research platforms used by legal professionals and students alike. They both offer wide range of legal information, including case law, statutes, regulations, legal news and more, helping their users stay up to date and on top of their game in the legal

Study skills for law students 1: How to study law effectively

If you’re a little bit like me… At primary school, there was little need for me to study and I still aced in every single subject. There was hardly any challenge so becoming a straight-A student was a piece of cake. In my teenage hubris, I thought that I