Veronika Rychlá

This case addressed the scope of "aggravated identity theft" under §1028A(a)(1), focusing on the use of another person's means of identification in relation to healthcare fraud. The Supreme Court vacated the lower court's decision, clarifying that the use of identification must be central to the fraudulent activity to

This case addressed whether Alabama's 2022 congressional districting plan violated §2 of the Voting Rights Act by likely being racially discriminatory. The Supreme Court affirmed the lower court's decision, finding the plan likely violated the Act. Introduction: The Supreme Court's decision in Allen v. Milligan et al. involves a significant

The case examines the legal boundaries of labor actions and their impact on employer property, focusing on a dispute between Glacier Northwest, a concrete delivery company, and the Teamsters Union. The core legal principle involves balancing the rights of labor unions to strike with the obligation to prevent harm to

This case examines the requirements for a public buyer to state a claim under § 11 of the Securities Act of 1933 in the context of a public offering of securities. The key doctrine centers on the interpretation of the Act's provisions regarding the obligations of issuers and the rights of

This case involves allegations against retail pharmacies under the False Claims Act (FCA), focusing on the legality of their pricing and billing practices. The key doctrine pertains to the standards and evidentiary requirements under the FCA for proving that claims made to government programs were knowingly false. Introduction: United States

This case addresses the legal ramifications of alleged misconduct by a correctional officer against a pretrial detainee. The key doctrine involves the examination of civil rights violations under 42 U.S.C. § 1983, particularly in the context of the use of force within correctional facilities and the responsibilities of correctional

This case concerns the regulatory authority of the Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) over private property under the Clean Water Act. The core issue revolves around the EPA's determination that the Sacketts' property contained wetlands subject to federal jurisdiction, thereby restricting their ability to develop the land without a permit. Introduction:

This case examines the legality and fairness of property seizure and sale by local governments for unpaid taxes, focusing on the proportionality of the government's action in relation to the tax debt owed. The core legal principle involves the balance between governmental authority to collect taxes and the property rights

This case examines the accountability of bank executives for financial mismanagement under federal regulatory standards. Specifically, it scrutinizes the actions of a bank CEO in managing loan relationships, under the oversight of the Federal Deposit Insurance Corporation (FDIC), to determine the legal boundaries of executive responsibility in the banking sector.

This case explores the legal accountability of internet platforms under the current legal framework, focusing on whether Google LLC can be held liable for content posted on its platforms that might have contributed to terrorist activities. The key doctrine at stake is the interpretation and application of laws governing internet