Jhazmin Marcelo

Audio Law Reader just started a case digest series on Criminal Law cases. Check out our two-minute case digest on Bundy v. Florida.🎧📚 0:00 /2:31 1× FACTS OF THE CASE: On January 7, 1978, Bundy rented a room near Florida State University. A week later, he was seen

Will the Court continue to allow people under restraining orders to keep their guns? Check out this one-minute case digest by Audio Law Reader.🎧📚 0:00 /1:13 1× FACTS OF THE CASE: Rahimi was convicted of possessing a gun while under a domestic violence protective order. Thus, he challenged

Mere creation of social media platforms or failure to remove certain content therein is not sufficient to establish aiding and abetting liability. This ruling on Twitter v. Taamneh in 2023 provides protection for communication service providers, such as social media companies, against potentially broad liability claims. Check out this two-minute

The government cannot compel individuals to create expressive content or speech that goes against their sincerely held beliefs. This ruling on 303 Creative LLC v. Elenis in 2023 is the new armor of creative designers in relation to their freedom of expression. Check out this two-minute case digest by Audio

The Constitution does not provide the right to abortion. This case on Dobbs v. Jackson Women's Health Organization et al. decided in 2022 overrules the landmark Decision of the Court in Roe and Casey. Check out this two-minute case digest by Audio Law Reader.🎧📚 0:00 /2:09 1× FACTS

Laws discriminating based on sex and transgender status are subject to heightened scrutiny, requiring an "exceedingly persuasive justification" to uphold such laws. This ruling has been decided in August 2022 on the case of Brandt v. Rutledge. Check out this two-minute case digest by Audio Law Reader.🎧📚 0:00 /2:

Art generated by artificial intelligence cannot be copyrighted. This ruling relative to the prevalence of applications powered by artificial intelligence nowadays has been held in the case of Thaler v. Perlmutter decided in August 2023. Check out this one-minute case digest by Audio Law Reader.🎧📚 0:00 /1:39 1×

Admission policies of educational institutions regarding race are not constitutionally permissible, unless it had otherwise undergone strict scrutiny, is clearly defined, and has measurable objectives for considering race as a factor in the admissions processes. This anti-racism ruling was from the case of Students for Fair Admissions, Inc. v. President