Get it on Google Play Preorder Audio Law Reader from App Store

Case Digest on Bundy v. Florida

Audio Law Reader just started a case digest series on Criminal Law cases. Check out our two-minute case digest on Bundy v. Florida.πŸŽ§πŸ“š



On January 7, 1978, Bundy rented a room near Florida State University. A week later, he was seen in a bar near the Chi Omega sorority house. 3 a.m. the following day, a resident of the sorority house encountered Bundy leaving the premises with a club in his hand. Subsequently, it was discovered that two women in the sorority house had been killed by strangulation and severe beating, and two others were severely beaten.

Further attacks occurred nearby, and the police were alerted. Some witnesses saw Bundy near the crime scenes, seemingly observing the aftermath. Bundy was even later seen by a police officer in the vicinity of the crime scenes, but fled. He was eventually arrested in Pensacola under unrelated charges.

After thorough forensic analysis, the evidence was considered sufficient to support convictions on all counts. The appeal now focuses on Bundy's points of contention.


1.      Bundy, acting as his own attorney, argues that the trial judge erred when he did not exclude the public and press from pretrial hearings, and thereby violated Bundy's right to a fair trial. - The trial judge held that there was a presumption in favor of open access to judicial proceedings in the absence of defendant’s failure to establish that closure was necessary.

2.      Bundy contends that the eyewitness testimony of Nita Neary should have been excluded from evidence because prior to trial she was hypnotized for the purpose of improving the quality and detail of her recollection of the man she saw leaving the sorority house. - The trial judge held that Nita Neary's testimony was based upon her independent recollection, untainted by any improper suggestions by the hypnotists.

Ultimately, the Florida Supreme Court upheld the trial court's decision that included the admissibility of evidence, the conduct of the trial, and the validity of the death sentences imposed on Bundy. The court's rulings affirmed Bundy's guilt and the imposition of the death penalty.


While Bundy's case did not establish a new doctrine, it highlighted the ongoing need for the justice system to address challenges related to pretrial publicity, mental health evaluations, security, and the admissibility of evidence to uphold the principles of a fair trial. These principles continue to be applied and refined in subsequent legal cases.